I occasionally check what keywords are trending folks to my blog from search engines. One that has steadily been creeping up is the key word search "Female Superiority". This one has been gaining over the past year and now is floating in the middle of the top ten. Visitors who frequent my site from that key word go on to view five other pages on the blog and spend an average of eight minutes reading. This makes it the most popular key word for new visitors.
Most who blog in this subject do not bridge the gap into female superiority and socital changes that are reflective of the truths becoming evident with increasing clarity. Some do, but most are focused on exploring the kink of FemDom. I personally do not believe there is justification to suggest women are superior in all things. I do find there is an inescapably clear trend of female advancement and tectonic shifts in the underlying fabric of our society as a result. Just a few generations ago, women were compelled to shelter under the physical superiority of men as societies were in firstly a pioneering phase and then an industrial phase. Both had a premium put on physical strength. Just as indicated by there being no women in the NFL, in these societal strata women were relegated to concede the need of male physical superiority to provide livelihoods and safty.
I am authoring this post in an attempt to welcome those who reach my blog from female superiority inquiries. Although you are most likely not apart of a kink community, your societal views mirror my own. My blog can be a resource for you to gain some insight into how such a relationship can be rewarding for both partners. I am not a relationship expert. I just write what I find works and it has proven to be helpful to many who have frequented the blog. If you wish to read an article by a relationship expert on the subject, I recommend the short introduction to male chastity by Dr. Tanya Larisse which can be found by clicking here. There are also several others linked below.
To me it is an exciting time in which to be living and the choir of voices which seem to be echoing the same is only growing. Over and over in male submissive kink blogs are posts from young women who say they have come to expect men to live under their leadership in their burgeoning relationships. This is not a kink, but a new societal paradigm that has taken deep root. For those who are of this class, no matter your age, I thank you for your efforts and you have a friend in me.
Sincerely,
-SH
18 comments:
To Mr SH
What I want to say first is that both Kathy and I have a great deal of respect for you and your wife.
You had the courage to tell your wife of your need to submit. She had the courage to become your mistress.
Over the past few weeks I have learned some difficult lessons.
At the present Kathy and I are going through a difficult time.
When a man goes to a dominatrix he not only cheats on his wife, but cheats on his entire family. It has taken some time for me to understand this.
I agree with everything in your post. The problem for us as males is that we tend to think with our small head instead of our brian.
Our thinking is often very superficial.
In a general type of way women tend to think deeper than we do.
They do a better job of reasoning things out. For the most part they have more of the mental skills to be sucessful than we do. Women can figure things out better. They are better at solving problems. I can see this in our daughter as well as in Kathy.
The problem for most of us is to learn how to put our male ago on the side, and accept women as our natural leaders. If we could learn to do this society would be well served.
Society would also be well served is young women required their husbands private parts to be locked up. If this had been the situation with me, it would have been impossible to have visited a dominatrix.
If I had the courage to be open with Kathy about my need for her control, it would have spared her a great deal of hurt.
There are things in my life that I am ashamed of. As one man to another I am not ashamed to admit that I am Kathy's slave boy.
john
Mr. Slave John,
Thank, and sorry to hear your Mistress and you are in a difficult patch. I hope it gets ironed out soon, as I feel you are well served to enjoy the domination she provides you. To me, in whatever form it takes, you should be grateful as it will be her gift to you to enjoy. I think you will find true submissive contentment when your mistress gives you these gifts, no matter in which form.
As to the points you raise, I too think the converse can be said. In times of hostilities or absent modern facilities where physical strength is vital, men make better leaders as their physical strength is on average greater. We do not live in such a time. Instead, skills girls and women hold a superiority in are of greater value. Men can be taught to become emotionally sensitive companions, but I feel it takes chastity as male orgasms are akin to emotional Novocain. Sadly, many men require a chastity device to remain chaste. I am one of them. As we proceed to juxtapose male leadership with female, as will invariable occur due to conferred degrees resting in female hands in far greater numbers, men will need develop skills women held previous (i.e. living subservient). To me this includes all the same as were present during patriarchal times and I outline them in my book.
Thx for taking the time to comment.
Sincerely,
-SH
I'm a firm believer in gender role which provides differenciation between sexes. But I think that saying that one sex is better than the other is irrelevant.
But I like the way you present your view on this. You wrote:
…I personally do not believe there is justification to suggest women are superior in all things. I do find there is an inescapably clear trend of female advancement and tectonic shifts in the underlying fabric of our society as a result… To me the concept of men enjoying living subservient to their girlfriends and wives is a wonderful pairing with the changes occurring in our society which make this a practical relationship model.
Nicely said and I agree with that. Men should have their input and might be better leaders in certain areas but the world would be better if socialization was done by women.
Mr. RC,
Thx for the comment. I have crossed paths with ones that believe in strict tabula raza among genders. I find that silly. I do understand that people now a days have a difficult time accepting the terms superior and inferior. To me the dictionary definitions are objectively accurate. Women are inferior football players. Men are superior. This is why there are no women in the NFL. If the Chicago Bears drafted a quarterback named Julie Cutler, she would have been dead by now. I do not consider this to be a hurtful statement directed to women. Just cold hard facts. So too, women are superior to men in many respects and men inferior. Again the dictionary definitions being objectively accurate. It just so happens that in our current post-industrial society the skills they are superior to us in are ones society is placing a premium on and as such the invisible hand of economics is in the process of reordering society. Men will need to come to terms with subservient roles, just as women did when they needed to rely on our physical strength to provide safety and substance. The converse will be required and the subservient male lifestyle seems all but certain to become expected.
-SH
"In the past 50 years, women have reached near parity with men as a share of the workforce and have begun to outpace men in educational attainment. About six-in-ten wives work today, nearly double the share in 1960. There's an unresolved tension in the public's response to these changes. More than six-in-ten (62%) survey respondents endorse the modern marriage in which the husband and wife both work and both take care of the household and children; this is up from 48% in 1977. Even so, the public hasn't entirely discarded the traditional male breadwinner template for marriage. Some 67% of survey respondents say that in order to be ready for marriage, it's very important for a man to be able to support his family financially; just 33% say the same about a woman."
-from new Pew Research Study
I think it is a bad idea to consider women from the standpoint of workforce participation percentages. There are women, my wife being one, whose choice is to be a stay-at-home mother first, and true recognition of their choices means that this choice must be honored as well as the choice to work outside the home.
With that said, it has been a privilege to grow up in a world that recognizes the role women can play outside the home as well.
Mr. C.,
Yes, I agree. I am sorry if I left the impression that female superiority is only displayed when a women participates in the work force, or holds a degree, or earns more money then her male counter part. I can see how I left that impression. That was not my intent. I believe women hold superiority in areas our society is placing a premium on. These exist if the women is working or not. Further, I believe that a women is better suited to be the head of a marriage. The societal changes just allow a wife being the head of a household to be socially accepted. It is this societal change I am encouraged to see. I am also encouraged to see society shifting to allow women the upper hand so men can be openly secondary to their superiority. The two (a women being a superior head of a marriage, and women being recognized as superior in society) are mostly mutually exclusive. As a proponent of WLM, I am just applauding and welcoming societal changes that make the lifestyle openly acceptable and holding status as a new paradigm.
Sorry if I failed to communicate this clearly.
Thank you for your comment.
Sincerely,
-SH
SH,
I sincerely appreciate this posting and the way that you approached the topic of female superiority. I really need to write about this at length at some point as I have changed so much in the past year in my own thinking. I know that I gave you much grief in the past but over the past several months have come to see that there is much truth in women being both superior and deservingly dominant in heterosexual relationships. Thanks for baring with me and for addressing my comments to you with tact and sincerity. Merry Christmas.
Mr. IH,
My intent for blogging is to put into words complex feelings and thoughts concerning living subservient. The transition and subsequent 24/7 service submission is a big change and the blog is a convenient place to do this exercise. Free too. I find it a form of mental yoga.
Also too, I get to cross paths with others who often hold differing views. This is helpful to me to further clarify my thoughts and feelings, as I get to consider views I had not considered before. Also, I am often encouraged to read similar accounts from fellow bloggers.
I have fielded tremendous criticism on this subject in the past. It gave me pause, but I can not back away from what I see to be so obvious of a truth, and so keep my position unchanged. Women are superior. This is my view. Others may hold differing views. They are welcome to. I see a rapidly growing body of objective evidence to lend credence to my view that our society is changing and is likely not to end on an egalitarian fulcrum, but instead be reordered with women more often then not, holding positions of authority. Conversly, men will be subservient.
Sincerely,
-SH
Mr SH,
I like very much your blog for what you say and the comments posted. In your last comment above you said very interesting things for me so I'd like to take this opportunity to give you some feedback.
You wrote My intent for blogging is to put into words complex feelings and thoughts concerning living subservient. In our couple we're transitioning as my wife is taking my place as HOH since introducing Orgasm Denial/Chastity device. I started my blog to allow me to regroup information I find useful elswhere and have the input of followers as it's useful for us to accompany us in this transitionning. And hopefuly to share with like minded people.
Also This is helpful to me to further clarify my thoughts and feelings, as I get to consider views I had not considered before. Self growth request being open minded and sharing and learning from others. It's nice to share with people that are not just talking but listening too.
And Women are superior. This is my view. I made an earlier comment that this affirmation was irrelevent. I hope I didn't offend you. It's not that I'm not sharing this idea, I do, but definitely not from a dogmatic point of view. And stating that blankly carry this impression even if it's not the case. I just referred an article in my last post that I'll comment soon that says exactly that. I invite you (if I may) to read it (http://mutualsubmission.blogspot.com/2011/12/why-mutual-submission.html).
As ...our society is changing and is likely not to end on an egalitarian fulcrum, but instead be reordered with women more often then not, holding positions of authority. Conversly, men will be subservient. I agree but it takes time. Unfortunately on one's individual time frame it's too long but on a human scale it goes fast (at least in western society). But to allow a societal change request that we teach our chidren and stand in front of others (work, friends,public) to our convictions and promote them. We're often too shy to do so but if we consider that it's for our world's benefit (it's so poorly run that I'm affraid of the legacy that will be left for generation to come).
And to do so it's important that we share ideas and find motivation and sharing with like minded people is a great way to do so. I'm new to blogging and following others' blogs on a regular basis but I'm surprised that so little comments and follow-up exists. So if you don't mind I'll follow you AND comment and I invite other discreet followers to do the same.
Ric C
Mr. RC,
Why thank you. That is a very nice comment.
I am not quite sure what you mean by ‘dogma’. I fear that word is too lofty for a simple man like myself. I can not equate it to the points I am making.
Regardless.
I agree with you that change is often slow. Not always though. If you are my age, you can remember a time when seeing a changing table in a men’s rest room would have been considered a communist subversive plot. Now, every new men’s rest room has accommodations for men to provide child care. This change occurred in the space of only a few years. Now, no one gives it a second thought. Change can be slow. It can also be quick. I fear I do not have the ability to predict which way this change will go, but to my view it is inevitable absence some form of nuclear apocalypse.
Sincerely,
-SH
I didn't meant that you were dogmatic in your writings- dogmatic: based on assumption rather than empirical observation, only when this phrase is usedWomen are superior. This is my view. I consider the subject is too complex to generalize to this extent. I think it's provocative and it's somewhat harmful for the cause. But I respect that you don't share my opinion on that point. Besides not all women are superior: I'm quite sure you'll agree with that!
As for the changes that can be fast I agree completely. If you talk about communism it means that we're probably not in our twenties... So much happened since the British Invasion (I talk about the music not the US pre-Independance!). Nevertheless since ten years there was small progress regarding females that sit on boards' companies.
That being said we live exciting years since things are moving relatively fast and I'm still young enough to see maybe a majority of men under the authority of women at work. Probably that is what will accelerate their empowerment at home.
Mr. RC,
I feel a little on theoretical ice and unable to get my footing.
Let me try again.
Your definition of dogma appears to be hair splitting the larger point. When I speak of female superiority it is in a macro sense. There is empirical objective evidence to support this claim. The body of evidence is growing. It is true this is my view, but I feel confident in making this claim based on what I see around me and the growing body of evidence which I feel can be objectively determined to correlated to my assumption. I do know, and encourage, that others have differing views. I state mine and do not consider it dogma, as you seem to suggest I am.
As for my age, I am post sputnik and grew up through the cold war. To my eyes, the change is as clear as good crystal. As to the change, one marker to keep in mind is 2017. That is the year women will hold 50% more secondary education degrees then men. I think we are kidding ourselves to think society will not quickly adjust to the new reality.
Sincerely,
-SH
Mr. Dan,
I filtered your comment. I 98% of the time allow comments through, but do request civility be a measure of comments.
I have been called delusional. Your attack is one I am familiar with. I refer you to the book by Dan Abrams, "Man Down". It is readily available.
Mr. Abrams is an American Lawyer and legal correspondent for NBC news. He argues the points you raise better then I. If you wish to honestly delve into the matter, his book would be a difficult thing to discard. If on the other had, you have a preconceived concept and are not open to alterative views, I would suggest you are the delusional party.
Sincerely,
-SH
Poor Dan Abrams wouldn't know the scientific method if it bit him in the proverbial buttocks. This book is so full of pseudo-science & pseudo-intellectual spin that it's assured to make an undergraduate student laugh.
Abrams bases all of his conclusions on the logical fallacy of arguing from the specific to the general.
Where's the bibliography? How can you write a book using "research" and not cite anything? Is that even legal? Also, stories reported by the New York Times are not scientific studies. The few arguments I found compelling I can't even look up the actual studies because he doesn't tell me what journal they were published in or who the scientists were.
---
All three quotes above are from reviews of the named book on Amazon.com. I copied them, because I couldn't say something different about the 'value' of this book -- it's quite entertaining, but it's in no way objective or even scientific.
Hanson
Mr. Hanson,
thank you for taking the time to comment.
if you are looking for empirical scientific research, the 2011 White House Report on Women is a good one. The federal government, being the largest employer in the country, has a wealth of information on which to draw. There are also legions of PhD statisticians behind the scenes of the report. I feel it should meet your standard.
Secondly, the federal agency National Center for Education Statistics (a division of the Department of Education), has a readily available report on gender trends in conferred degrees. It is drawn from data over decades. The trend is inescapable clear and you would have to be delusional to ignore societal conclusions that can be drawn from their forecasting.
I would have to agree with you that Mr. Abrams book is not directed at a scientific audience. It is directed for popular consumption. I feel he would of authored it differently if his target audience were as you seem to be wishing he would. This may be a bit of a news flash, but folks like your self who are so wound up and defensive over an issue as to demand a PhD dissertation for any view contrary are a small market segment. I like to call this market segment the Japanese soldier post wwII, as you are akin to such a soldier guarding his atoll cave 7 years after the war was over and no amount of convincing will get you out of your cave. For the rest of us, for whom Mr. Abrams directed his book to, his approach is acceptable for us to consider his opinion and decide for ourselves. Personally, I agree with him. I am well aware others may not and hold no grudge against them.
Again thank you for taking the time to comment.
-SH
You are confusing your own femdom fetishes with women advances in the workplace. There are many reason for that but none of them has to do with female supremacy.
Female supremacy is mostly advocated by submissive males and women like Elise Sutton who sell something to them.
I do not know if you are delusional but let say it, of you like to play a dog in the context of bdsm you are ok, if you start to believe that you are a dog you have some issues.
Mistress Sara,
I agree. It was my intent to keep the two issues separate. Let me reply to your analogy this way.
If I enjoy being treated as a dog in a BDSM scene, and it turns out for some reason, this practice becomes socially acceptable, I should not be faulted for welcoming the change.
I do think you would agree men are superior football players. There are no women in the NFL. So too, women are superior in skills over their male counterparts. Female superiority is not strange or mean spirted or anything the like. It has existed forever. It just so happens, in our post industrial society, those skills women are superior in are becoming of more value.
Thank you for your comment.
-SH
Post a Comment