I was reading an article by Jonathan Rauch of Reason Magazine. In it is referenced forecasting by the federal agency National Center for Education Statistics (a division of the Department of Education), which indicates an inescapably clear trend. Women are outnumbering men in conferred degrees. This is inclusive of both Bachelor’s and Master’s. By 2017, the trend holding, there will be 50% more women than men obtaining post-highschool degrees. This is staggering to consider.
There are male chauvinist on the internet who consider this to be a subversive conspiracy which is coming to fruition. I find that to be silly. In my view, the pervasive egalitarian expectations society has placed into daily life have allowed the innate abilities that women have an upper hand with to bear fruit. Women are showing the skills Hanna Rosin so eloquently portrays in her TED:Talk video (linked below) and are simply flourishing more so then males can in the same environment. There is no conspiracy. It is simple free-market capitalist forces at work. When the principle skills in demand were associated with physical strength, men held the upper hand. In a post-industrial egalitarian society, women are able to succeed more so then men. Physical strength is no longer a bread winning skill.
In a macroeconomic view, human intellectual capital resting increasingly in the hands of women will undoubtedly change the fabric of society. This is not a submissive man making a fairy tale about a utopian matriarchal parallel universe. These are real Department of Education statistics which the federal government maintains over decades, using objective, industry accepted practices. We are now in the shift away from working moms coming home for their “second shift” into increasingly accepted domesticated fathers/husbands. My dad never changed a diaper. I know of no peers who can claim the same. In the coming years, subservient husbands will almost certainly become so common as to be often expected by society. I just do not see how our changing society will end on an egalitarian fulcrum point when economic power will increasingly rest with women. There will have to also be changes where men come to accept subservient roles. For me, this is a welcome change I look forward to.
In 1950, Mr. Rauch indicates in his article that fewer than half of Americans obtained high school diplomas. During this time physical skills were at a premium and advanced education did not have the same value it does in our post-industrial society. Men were able to earn good wages in the vast agriculture industries or manufacturing. There were also the trade unions for an avenue to meaningful employment. Those days are gone. Physical skills men hold an upper hand with are primarily limited to use in the construction and military sectors. It is unlikely those will ever change and become sectors where women are employed in great numbers. However, in the rest of the post-industrial economic sphere, intellectual skills demonstrated by obtaining degrees will be held by women and therefore the bulk of the economic decision making will rest with them. The fabric of society will quickly adjust. When men outnumbered women three-to-one in obtaining degrees, women were often expected to marry a man with high earning potential and then learn to live as his dutiful wife. The converse will invariably become true when the numbers are reversed. National Center for Education Statistics
http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2020/sec6b.asp
Hanna Rosin Video:
http://www.ted.com/talks/hanna_rosin_new_data_on_the_rise_of_women.html
Jonathan Rauch is a senior writer and columnist for National Journal and a frequent contributor to Reason. The article was originally published by National Journal.


28 comments:
Sadly, these days a college degree means nothing in most fields, formal education is a thing of the past, especially when you look at the people who have achieved the greatest innovations and contributed to the growth of the economy the most in the last 30 years - Gates, Google founders, Zuckerberg, Jobs...all college dropouts.
Dude, that baby's just a bit too close to the stove there...
Mr. Anon #1,
I believe you are suggesting the points are moot due to the lack of diplomas in the people you mention. I find that view to be obtuse considering the people working in the companies you mention do not follow suit. Staff employees at MS-Corp, Google Corp, Facebook Corp, almost w/o exception will be degree educated in secondary & post secondary courses. The men you mention were all students in elite secondary institutions who choose to drop out to pursue a business venture. It is not that they failed. They are borderline mensa members.
-SH
Anon #2,
;-}
I know, right?
lol....
-SH
No, it's just that you seem to suggest that a college degree is the only indicator of whether you'll have a successful career or not, and while that may be the case for many people, it simply hasn't been the case at the highest level in the last few decades, and I think that you'll agree that there's no higher level than to found a company out of nothing and bring it into the Fortune 500.
I have no doubt that these people had the capabilities to successfully get their degrees but they probably concluded that having a degree at that point won't help them in achieving their goals, so why waste time on obtaining it.
*Sorry for the possible errors, English is not my first language*
Ahh, I see.
I am sure there is sufficient objective statistics to back my argument that holding a degree translates into increased earning potential. In the specific cases you mention, it was not. Nor in those who win LOTTO. In a macroeconomic sense, I am comfortable in saying that is the case and challenge you to counter, if you wish.
My first thought actually was along the lines that all these degrees mean nothing bla bla but then maybe that is a touch of defensiveness. Devalue the value of the degree by saying it is worthless.
You are right when you mention that the value of a person has moved away from physical labour. Even in areas where physical labour was traditionally seen as the ownly answer, technology is removing the need for physical labour. For example the mining companies like women to drive those great huge trucks because they do a better job. They have power steering and power everything so you do not need some great hulking bloke to drive them.
Wow... great treatise.
I much prefer your writing to Kant and those other philosophers! :)
Seriously -- good job! I'm impressed. But, hope your Wife is, that is what counts.
We can see the sign of the times in the news...
For example, Virginia Rometty was just named CEO of IBM.
Mr SMH,
Hello. True that with mechanics, women do have a foot hold into the construction and mining sectors. I just don’t think they will ever be female dominated professions though. Same thing with military. There are now ranks of women, but it just seems like a profession men will always do better in.
Mr. SS,
This subject I do come out with guns blazing. I have been attacked in the past when I expressed my views. I was being delirious. I was being mean to female submissives. I was not being objective. I was using abhorrent terms. On and on. It became a real hot button.
To me the trend is clear as day. I just think people are finding accepting it to be difficult. Since the current societal expectation is egalitarianism, anything that suggests women are superior at something society is placing a premium on draws sharp criticism. It is just nature that men are better at some things and women are better at others. Men are superior football players. That is why there are no women in the NFL. Using the term 'superior' is correct. Women are superior at things a post-industrial society is placing a premium on and therefor they are gaining the upper hand slowly-by-slowly. The treand is clear as good crystal. To me it is fair to then use the words superior and inferior as the dictionary definitions reflect just that.
-SH
Anon,
below is a link to a post I did about Forbes 100 most influential women in the world. It too is chocked full of other along the same lines.
thx for the addition.
-SH
LINK:
http://subservient-husband.blogspot.com/2011/08/forbes-magazine-report-100-most.html
SH.
I love your blog and it gives me the realization that thee are many men like you and me. I too am the bread winner in my home. In fact my wife does not work and is able to stay home and busy herself with things she enjoys. She does not do one bit of house work. It is my dream situation and keeps getting better. I believe in one of your posts, you wished for something like what I have; am I correct? When i get back from my day at the office, I then complete about 3 hours of chores for my Wife while she relaxes. I would love for you to read my blog as well. I have been away for a while but I have returned
obedient husband
Mr. MLS,
Yes sir. I love it too. We are a duel income home, but I am the bread winner. When I get home, I cook dinner, clean the kitchen, tend to all the chores and manage the children’s evening routines. My wife either works on her laptop, enjoys some diversions, or puts me to use giving her a massage. Just writing this is giving me an erection in my chastity device. I love it. Even better if she were not working.
Many single parents work and then tend all the chores. No reason why a man can not do the same, saving his dominant wife’s time for her own pursuits. My wife’s hand has not touched an iron in over two years. For me, it is a badge of honor and a sign of privilege at being kept as her submissive, dutiful, docile, husband while she enjoys herself however she feels she would enjoy most, using me in whatever way is helpful.
-SH
P.S. – ouch spikes digging into erection.... Back to cleaning bed linins.
Dear SH
seems like we are spending our day in a very similar manner. I too am locked up and cleaning the house from top to bottom. My Wife e mails me my daily chores with an apple app called HOME CHORES today my list is 50 items long and includes dusting everywhere, vacuuming all floors windexing all galss and windows kitchen cleaning bathrooms (3) doing all wood floors by hand cleaning three pairs of my Wife's flip flops and shoes. While tending to my kids of course. My Wife is out for a spa day and if I am lucky when she gets home later tonight around 9 pm, I will get to massage and worhip the bottoms of her feet... i too am in pain here with a large erection. hehe back to toiling
Obedient Husband
Oh, I have so been there (minus the apple app, but how hot does that sound?). Enjoy your afternoon & evening. Hope you get lucky.
SH
how do we become friends on here? Sorry i am a newbie to blogging LOL
obedient husband
ps my wife just tested me from the spa with her GFs and added 5 more items to my list. I LOVE HER
Mr. SH- Thanks for sharing that. I too have been noticing with increasing frequency the ways that women are overtaking men in today's world. A couple times I was going to write down a link or clip a story,but of course being weak and lazy, I did not. :)
Hmm, this idea of Mrs MLS's apple app sure seems to simplify things for the women, no...? LOL!
I've got to get cracking on chores here soon.
You guys are right, though... while I'm not caged, I'm getting hard and wet in my assigned panties here... Thanks for all!
M
Mr. MLS,
There is a “followers” section down below where you can sigh up if you wish.
I bet your wife was bragging to her GRs @ the SPA about how much she has you under her thumb. HOW HOT!!!. I be when she gets home she will let you kiss her feet, if you are a good boy.
Enjoy
-SH
I'm definitely seeing this also. It is exciting. I'm sure it will have some sort of effect in terms of marketing, advertising, and just general economic practices.
Mistress L,
Yes, I agree with you. There will be noticeable shifts in the public arena. For instance I think prime time programming like Desperate Housewives, Grey's Anatomy, and Cougar Town, are all examples as they are programming bread winning men with dutiful wives would not select while the remote is in their hands. These are programs catered to women who have the liberty to choose evening programming.
Another shift I think is eminent is women feeling comfortable telling other women they had to spank their husbands for one reason or another. During patriarchal time, that was a common practice among men. A dutiful house husband will invariable find himself in the same situation.
-SH
Dear SH
This is true. my Wife is always telling her GFs to be dominant with their husbands and to give them lists of chores and to make them obey. My Wife's GF have seen for their own eyes me waiting on her hand and foot and even kissing the soles of her feet. They love it but have not approached it with their husbands. I. Never miss a chance to tell males or females that my Wife owns me and that I love to be her total obedient servant.
Servant hubby
MR SH Over at "Wife Worshipper" blog, i made a few comments recently that i would like to condense here. In the WW blog post about cars, i mentioned that 30 years ago, if you saw a couple in a car, the man was always driving.Nowdays this isnt the case.At least 20 % of the t ime the woman seems to be driving.ad this seems to be increasing.Ive even seen couples go on double dates where the two women travel up front and the men sit in the back.
And more and more at dinner parties that i go to, its the men that clean up afterwards. At WW's blog i mentioed how i once helped a male friend fix and serve food at a networking event for female bankers ,that his wife held at her home.He needed an extra hand and aske d for my help.We served food and drinks and stayed completly and quietly in the background while the wife played hostess and the women chatted. Since i was about ten years older then the other people there, i was probably the only one who noticed the complete role reversal from what a social event from the 1970s would look like.
These types of things are subtle displays of how women have become more confident ,empowered and assertive in the past 40 years.
A large percentage of my male friends do all of the housework .and at least half have wives that earn more than they do.One even quit his job because of childcare costs for thier two kids.And his wife made more money as a nurse then he did as a carpenter
As you say, these type of things arent "femdom".But defintly are real life FLRs.The networking event that my friend's wife had wasnt a fetish party.We werent treated like slaves.Quit e the opposite. Me and my friend were basicly ignored.The party wasnt about us.It was about his wife and her female co-workers.We simply poured drinks,served food and generally kept in the kitchen out of the way.More and more men are going to have to learn how to stay in the background more.
MR SH In the near future, i think women will become more powerfull in society overall. I dont think men will beome "slaves ".But i think that with large corporations increasingly outsourcing overseas.and with more and more people becoming "contractors".that more and more Americans will be self -employed.And that a lot of these new home based family runbusinesses will be run by the wife .
In the 1950s most women werent scttterbrained housewives like the one Lucille Ball played.They were smart women who often played a major supporting role in thierhusband's careers or businesses.More and more ,i think this will become the role for many husbands.Networking from home has allowed many men to have jobs, and still be stay at home dads[i know more than a few fathers that arent full time househusbands.But only work a couple of days a week from home so they can watcht he kids while thier higher paying wives work full time].
Husbands will be nuch more likely to be thier wives secratary,bookkeeper.and will help prepare dinner and lunchparties for her clients and co-workers.And more and more i think it will be the daughter that is groomed to take over the family business form the Mother.An d more and more young men will have to learn to be like thier fathers and take a subordinate role in the family business.This sort of thing will spill over into family life.With less of the traditional attention paid to the son's sporting activities and more attention paid to the Daughter's activities.With Father & Son not thinking anything strange about preparing snacks for the Mother's or Daughter's Women's soccer team.Or at staying home doing housework while the mother and daughter go out.And when couples visit other couples, its already becoming more and more common for the visiting husband to join the host husband in the kitchen while the women chat in the living room[it happens to me often]
MR SH I hope that you dont mind my long comments.I would just like to thank you for not just focusing on the sexual aspects of FLR's.But also looking at the social and political aspects as well.
Much of pop culture seems aimed at and geared towards women nowdays.There is still some old fashioned saexist shows for men.But prime time tv seems extremly geared towards women.Shows like Grey's anatomy,ect, cater to women. And more and more you are seeing "male skin" outnumber scenes of "female skin".Men in shows like Grey's Anotomy dont seem to go more than 5 minutes wothout taking thier shirts off
Pretty soon the cliche of the wife serving her husband and his buddies beer while they watch football,may soon be replaced with a new cliche of a husband serving his wife and her girlfriends wine and snacks while they watch a "chick flick", a female oriented tv show [Grey's Anatomy,ect] or even a tv show featuring men in skimpy outfits [ i once visited a friend and found myself in the kitchen with him as his wife,Sister-in Law, and another woman hooted and made remarks about the bodies of the male beach volleyball players they were watching on tv]
Advertising has always been aimed at women.But more and more the commercials are less about the wife pleasing her husband.and more about female empowerment themes .
I hope that one day you can do a post on how tv and movies are becoming more and more female oriented.I think its an interesting subject.
Mr. Bob,
Thx for taking the time to post your thoughts. I greatly appreciate it.
To me the most telling element in the story you convey about the women bankers having a casual meeting in your friend’s home was that it was unremarkable to all but you. The situation was taken for granted as not worthy of mention at how diametrically opposed the circumstance was to only a few decades ago. These changes are occurring quickly and acceptance is amazingly fast to adjust. As my post indicates, there are unavoidable macroeconomic forces which will invariably accelerate this process further. Those who say, “oh that will never happen” or “oh that will take so long I will never live to see it” are just fooling themselves. The macroeconomic forces have an amazingly powerful way of changing the fabric of society faster then could be imagined.
At least, that is my opinion. There is clearly accelerated change going to occur in this area. I for one, embrace the change.
Sincerely,
-SH
MR SH
Thank you for your reply. I was born in 1970.and its defintly a generational thing.I used to live next to and use a laundromat.And i knew the people in the neighborhood who used it and whether they were married or not.And i would say that a birth date around 1970 was very roughly the "fault line". Most couples bornroughly before then gerally were marriages where the wife did the housework.Those that were born after 1970 [and especially after 1980] the husband/boyfriend did most or all of the housework and laundry.
The husband of the banker that i mentioned is now a stay at home dad who telecommutes from home for a part time job.Many men can, and are , telecommuting from home nowdays.So while i dont think there will be many full time househusbands. Telecommuting allows men to be stay at home dads and sources of family income.In the cases that i personally know of, it leads to the husbands ebing the one who does the housework,ect.And ive yet to hear any of the husbands complain about it.Or the wives.
The changes in gender roles over the last 20 years have been incredible.And im sure that will continue. And im guessing that much of the changes to come will very soon be taken for granted.
Some commenters here have gotten angry at you for suggesting that a FLR is possible. Too often i think they are men whose wives dont want to engage in kinky sex play.While thats unfortunate .Its not evidence that women cant,wont, or dont want to, be in charge of a marriage.Or in charge of society in general
This development, which has been under way for some time, has serious implications for the viability of the middle class. In the past, along with college-educated professionals, the blue collar unionized workforce has been the bedrock of the middle class.
Job opportunities for recent college graduates are at the lowest level since World War II and the unionized workforce has shrunk dramatically. It's not just that the rich have gotten dramatically richer; middle class incomes have stagnated and the size of the middle class has shrunk. The situation may improve when the economy improves as it will one day but I wonder if we'll ever get back to where we were in terms of workforce balance.
An equally profound effect of the change cited -- more closely related to the concerns of this blog -- is consequence for male-female relations. How will men adjust to dealing socially with women who are better educated than they are and, very likely, earning more money? Not very well is my guess. A minority of males may be ready to acknowledge female superiority in the bedroom and a smaller minority ready to acknowledge it in real life. But most men are certainly not prepared to do so, and the impact of that disjunction will be considerable.
Anon,
Hello. Thx for the comment.
Considering the statistics concerning American middle class, I believe that is a political issue which is off topic. I appreciate your view though.
As to acceptance, I respectfully disagree. I think women holding despairing economic power will quickly translate into accepted subservience from their male counterparts. Necessity is the mother of invention and I think too when the macroeconomic forces bring to bear the new despairing reality, I believe men will quickly learn to accept. Anyway, that is my view. For instance, look how quickly Americans began to buy Japanese automobiles so soon after being at war with them. Driving a Japanese built car in 1947 would draw sharp criticism. In 1990, no one cared. It was the new economic reality and was just simply accepted.
Respectfully,
-SH
Post a Comment